| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| => 13 Manufacturers have NO SPEC. on the Wireless equipment, is that normal ? | 14 Feb 2004 01:41 GMT | 1 |
Manufacturers technical specification data allow you to know the quality of the different proposed equipment's and brands. Ask for them. How can professional keep telling you that the equipment they sell is
|
| --> 14 Why that childish behavior of pro's subject wireless fails ? | 14 Feb 2004 01:41 GMT | 1 |
Why that childish behavior of some so called professionals when it boils down to Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) subject wireless fire/intruder detection systems fails? Pro's, make an inside look and recall the knowledge prerequisite
|
| => 15 What spec.'s are involved with wireless ? | 14 Feb 2004 01:41 GMT | 1 |
What spec.'s are involved with wireless? What spec.'s are required to understand the reliability of wireless alarm systems during RFI? Manufacturers just in case you don't know it, find here some minimum
|
| => 17 Are cell phones more reliable than wireless alarm systems? | 14 Feb 2004 01:41 GMT | 1 |
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:49:16 GMT, "Rob" <Nobody@home.com> wrote: The following question was raised:
>Paul, you say that wireless alarm systems are unreliable, > aren't cell phones wireless too? |
| => 18 Wired / Wireless alarm systems? | 14 Feb 2004 01:41 GMT | 1 |
What is the basic difference between wired and wireless alarm systems? It boils down to the "connections link" between sensors and control panel of both systems, besides that sensor data connection link both systems are alike.
|
| => 20 Blind purshase of Wireless alarm systems | 14 Feb 2004 01:41 GMT | 1 |
Buyers: - do you always purchase an equipment without having a basic idea about theyre quality, performance on the major part of its design?
|
| => 21 The wireless alarm OWL will wake you up | 14 Feb 2004 01:40 GMT | 1 |
YOU have a wireless alarm system with that (so called) maintenance pro's "imaginative" RFI detection circuit? Wireless remain anyhow: UNRELIABLE during Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI)
|
| => 22 What is involved in RFI? | 14 Feb 2004 01:40 GMT | 1 |
What isn't clear to the owners and future owners of wireless alarm systems about the Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) problem is that isn't the operational / setup features who are involved, it is the RECEIVER ONLY who capture ALL incoming wave on hiss frequency, by
|
| =>25 Wireless dual frequency dual band systems from France | 14 Feb 2004 01:40 GMT | 1 |
I have been informed that, due to my postings, at least 2 manufacturers in france have changed theyre wireless alarm system receivers and transmitters to "dual frequency" on "dual band" wireless connections.
|
| => 26 avoid wireless alarm systems | 14 Feb 2004 01:40 GMT | 1 |
They are not reliable and are dead on warning when a transmitter operates in a condition who muzzle the wireless alarm system. This is easily done with Radio Transmitters operating: - ON the wireless frequency
|
| => 27 RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm systems.. | 14 Feb 2004 01:40 GMT | 1 |
RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm systems.. I showed that RFI is an unavoidable nuisances for wireless alarm systems in several posts. I had a case who muzzled my wireless alarm system for more than one
|
| => 28 Why do you not use only wireless alarm systems ? | 14 Feb 2004 01:39 GMT | 1 |
Why do you not use only wireless alarm systems? Because wireless is Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) sensitive and NOTHING can avoid / prevent that. Even worse, it don't warn you when the system is "muzzled and
|
| List of Professionals published by Jim Wireless Alarm System specialist | 14 Feb 2004 01:39 GMT | 4 |
On 25 Nov 2001 00:01:36 GMT, in alt.security.alarms alarminex@aol.comQzapp (Alarminex) wrote: SNIP ===============================================================
|
| => 24 Did you ever attempted to read an erased house number? | 14 Feb 2004 01:37 GMT | 1 |
Did you ever attempted to read an erased house number? That's what some incompetent pro's tend to let you believe. 1. During Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI) the wireless alarms systems receiver is muzzled.
|
| How do I block the retard? | 13 Feb 2004 18:41 GMT | 12 |
How do I use that skynet.be thing with outlook 2000? I put it on the blocked senders and still see the nutbar. Am I doomed to his incessant rants every time I pop in? Damn Gates, damn him. What newsreaders do y'all use?
|