You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free HomeKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: 90 amps for electric car charge!
| David Nebenzahl | 17 Feb 2010 19:10 |
On 2/17/2010 7:40 AM Bob F spake thus:
>> On 2/16/2010 4:23 PM Bob F spake thus: >> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > will, by reducing the production of the equivalent power burning coal. Less CO2 > is produced with the methane. Except that this is the wrong comparison: the methane is being used to power garbage trucks, so the proper comparison would be with gasoline, diesel or propane.
So the only carbon that's being kept out of the atmosphere is the marginal difference between the carbon emitted by burning one of these fuels and the carbon emitted by burning methane. Not at all what the TV news report said.
 Signature You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.
- a Usenet "apology"
|
| Bob F | 17 Feb 2010 15:40 |
> On 2/16/2010 4:23 PM Bob F spake thus: > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > H20) > Try to read more carefully. Try to write more carefully then.
"this would reduce carbon dioxide emissions" is what you said. And it clearly will, by reducing the production of the equivalent power burning coal. Less CO2 is produced with the methane.
|
| David Nebenzahl | 17 Feb 2010 04:02 |
On 2/16/2010 4:23 PM Bob F spake thus:
>> Just last night I heard a local news report about recovering methane >> from landfills for use as fuel. While this is a good thing overall, [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Plus, recovering methane and using it to create energy prevents the methane from > escaping to become a greenhouse gas. The energy produced is a bonus. Totally beside the point; the news report said specifically that capturing the methane and burning it would mean that the carbon in the methane wouldn't be released into the atmosphere. The CO2 released when the methane is burned is most definitely a greenhouse gas. (Remember the formula from high school chemistry? CH4 + 02 --> CO2 + H20)
Try to read more carefully.
 Signature You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.
- a Usenet "apology"
|
| Bob F | 17 Feb 2010 00:23 |
> Just last night I heard a local news report about recovering methane > from landfills for use as fuel. While this is a good thing overall, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > burned. All that's being done is delaying the release of the CO2. > Sheesh; are we *really* that much a nation of idiots? Nope. Just you.
Methane produces less CO2 per unit of energy produced than coal or gasoline.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/co2-emission-fuels-d_1085.html
Plus, recovering methane and using it to create energy prevents the methane from escaping to become a greenhouse gas. The energy produced is a bonus.
|
| David Nebenzahl | 16 Feb 2010 21:45 |
On 2/15/2010 7:16 AM trader4@optonline.net spake thus:
> The second big omission is that you always hear the media gushing over > this cars as "zero emissions". Which is true only if you [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > conventional fuels and all you're doing is moving the pollution from > one place to another. This point can't be emphasized enough, as it's true that the pinhead media always seems to get this one wrong and leaves the mistaken impression that "green" electric cars run on pixie dust or some such.
Just last night I heard a local news report about recovering methane from landfills for use as fuel. While this is a good thing overall, the stupid reporter (or editor) got away with saying that this would reduce carbon dioxide emissions! Of course this is totally untrue: while the methane would be captured instead of simply venting to the atmosphere, the carbon dioxide would be released later when it was burned. All that's being done is delaying the release of the CO2. Sheesh; are we *really* that much a nation of idiots?
Now, you and I are on opposite sides of this debate in lots of ways concerning the overall viability of renewable energy, nuclear power, etc. But I agree 100% with you here. Such stupid oversights on the part of the media (and even on the part of some who promote green energy) can only set things back.
 Signature You were wrong, and I'm man enough to admit it.
- a Usenet "apology"
|
| trader4@optonline.net | 15 Feb 2010 15:16 |
> Is your garage electric car ready? > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Cities Prepare for Life With the Electric Car...http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/business/15electric.html Yeah, what you have to plug it into is one of the key facts the green folks promoting electric cars as a big solution fail to mention. Aside from the installation cost of an appropriate circuit, it's not exactly that awful either. True, it takes a 90A circuit to fully charge the car in 4 hours. But if you look at the table there are other very viable options:
90A 4 hours 60A 5 hours 40A 7.5 30A 10
That gets you to fully charged with a range I guess of about 225 miles. If you use the car mainly as a second car for short drives around town, driving to a commuter lot, etc., it sounds viable.
The second big omission is that you always hear the media gushing over this cars as "zero emissions". Which is true only if you conveniently ignore that all this power still has to be generated someplace. In some small amount of cases today, it could be green, eg where the car is charged at night using excess hydroelectric. But for most of the country, the power today still has to come from conventional fuels and all you're doing is moving the pollution from one place to another. And possible introducing more, as I'm not sure what the total energy/emissions balance looks like, ie burning a gallon of gasoline in a car vs burning say coal to generate the electricity, then sending it over a transmission system with losses, etc.
|
| Bill | 15 Feb 2010 14:01 |
Is your garage electric car ready?
Seems these cars can be charged with a regular 15 amp outlet, any 240 volt outlet (50 amps best), or a 90 amp "4 hour charge" connection... http://www.teslamotors.com/electric/charging.php
Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) describes a system in which electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles communicate with the power grid to sell demand response services by either delivering electricity into the grid or by throttling their charging rate... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle-to-grid
Cities Prepare for Life With the Electric Car... http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/business/15electric.html
|
Quick links:
|
|
|