>I have a builder who wants to give me a cost plus price ,with cap, on >building my house. Is this a sensible approach if a lock and key price >would be, IMO, too hard to arrive at by either of us? If you cannot work out a lock and key price, how can you establish a cap that is fair to both of you?
Generally, I fall back on cost plus when a project is so complex and unpredictable that it is not worth anyone's time to try to figure out a fixed price.
Cost plus works best either between parties with equal knowledge or parties with a history of trust. If his current clients and a couple of his previous clients were happy on a cost plus basis, perhaps you can consider it.
>Also, he wants me to pay for the builder's risk insurance. How common >is this? Should I say no? It's common. Your project, your risk. You should expect to pay a marked up price for everything directly associated with the project, but not for anything that is normal operating overhead -- truck, cell phone, business insurance, office overhead and so on. That is included in his mark up.
>I assume the "plus" part of cost plus is negotiable as well. Does >anyone have a clue as to what that should be in the rural deep south? >He threw out 11 percent as a wild guess for a house this size. Not enough info here -- There is not twice as much work for a builder in a 500 thousand dollar home as in a 250 thousand dollar home. Eleven percent of a l00 thousand dollar project would be very low -- eleven percent of a two million dollar house would work just fine, thanks.
Builders here look for fifteen percent or so on a two hundred thousand dollar home ... your mileage may vary so ask around.
|