 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneralRural LivingHome AutomationSecurity AlarmsConstructionRepairPlumbingCleaningPest ControlLawn and Garden |
Homeowner Forum / Security Alarms / July 2009Sell LCD telephone Burglar Alarm Systems
Lenser Technology Co., Ltd., is a professional manufactuer for security products. Our manily products is about GSM house alarm systems,auto-dial alarm systems,CCTV DVRs,IP cameras,security locks. We assure our customers the most competitive price, the most timely delivery,the best service. Alarm systems: 1. GSM home alarm systems: LS-GSM-I/ LS-GSM-II/ LS-GSM-III/ LS-GSM- MMS 2. Auto-dail alarm systems: LS-800 /LS-801 /LS-802 3. Alarm accessories: gas detectors, smoke detectors, emergency button, PIR detectors, wireless flashing siren, wireless remote control,power supply and so on. Stand alone DVRs: 4. MJPEG format: 4-channel DVR 5. MPEG4 format: 4-channel DVR 6. H.264 format: 4/8/16-channel DVR GPS/GSM/GPRS trackers: 7. GPS car tracker 8. GPS personal tracker 9. GPS pet tracker Alice Hsu Marketing Department Lenser Technology Co.,Ltd MSN:lensertech@hotmail.com SKYPE:alicexu007 On Jun 2, 3:46 am, lensert...@gmail.com wrote: > Lenser Technology Co., Ltd., is a professional manufactuer for > security products. Our manily products is about GSM house alarm [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > MSN:lensert...@hotmail.com > SKYPE:alicexu007 Wow even G Morgan can install one of these http://yukagroup.diytrade.com/sdp/534616/4/pd-2804056/4904789-0/Sell_LCD_telepho ne_Burglar_Alarm_Systems.html > "mleuck" wrote... > > Wow even G Morgan can install one of these > > http://yukagroup.diytrade.com/sdp/534616/4/pd-2804056/4904789-0/Sell_LCD_telepho ne_Burglar_Alarm_Systems.html I'm confused about three things on that page... First... It has "8 wireless different zones and 8 wires zones." It also has "13 LED to indicate the alarm zone." So if those last three zones go into alarm you just have to guess at what's happening? Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button: Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work? And third... everything else on that page. Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? Yes, they are detachable, but it limits the range to about 10".  Signaturejs Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote. >> Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? > > Yes, they are detachable, but it limits the range to about 10". So it probably doesn't matter if they're attached or not. First they say >250m (perfect for convering fields), then 30-50m (it's not their fault you went and put walls in your house), now we're down to 10". On the other hand, this may be why you have to order at least 100 systems. >> "mleuck" wrote... >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button: > Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work? HOME/AWAY. HOME=NO PIR AWAY=YES PIR > And third... everything else on that page. > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? >> Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button: >> Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work? > > HOME/AWAY. HOME=NO PIR > AWAY=YES PIR You know, that little comment makes more sense than anything else on that page. >>> Second... "Two wireless remote controllers: Four button: >>> Disarm/arm/panic/PIR detector" How exactly does that last button work? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You know, that little comment makes more sense than anything else on that > page. jsut guessing. I have got pretty good a chinklish though after years of using import DVR's > > "mleuck" wrote... > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? Doesn't everyone want door contacts with fancy antennas? "mleuck" wrote... > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? > > Doesn't everyone want door contacts with fancy antennas? Somehow I doubt it would go over well with many people. Many of my customers are unhappy about the size of the wireless contacts from DSC, even the newer ones which are a little bit smaller than the last version of them. I haven't tried the new "vanishing" contacts yet, but they look like they'll be more appealing. On the other hand, they're from Secure Wireless (?), not DSC. The other Secure Wireless contacts I've used (small surface) don't have as good of a range on them as the regular DSC stuff. - Chris > "mleuck" wrote... >> > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > - Chris I've had no problems whatsoever with the DSC "vanishing" contacts. If they have a reduced range, I can't say that I've noticed it. Doug >> "mleuck" wrote... >>>> Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Doug Ditto! "Frank Olson" wrote... >>> "mleuck" wrote... >>>>> Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Ditto! Within a normal house, I wouldn't expect a problem with the Secure Wireless contacts. The problems I've had with their small surface contacts have been when the receiver is in the house and the contact is in a detached shop. Unfortunately, there's lots of those around here. The most surprising one I had was a shop about 100 feet from the house. Wood siding on the house and metal siding on the shop. The door was about 120-130 feet from the receiver, going through the outer wall of the shop, and two interior walls of the house (garage door was open). The Secure Wireless contact would only open and close the zone up to about 100 feet of the receiver (without the metal-sided shop wall in the way). Close enough where you could still here the keypads door chime. Switched it out with a standard DSC contact... didn't have a problem at all. The only time a DSC contact has failed me for range was going through a log wall, perhaps a couple interior walls (long time ago), about 500-600 feet of field with a couple trees, and two wood-framed plywood walls in a shop. On the other hand, the contact on the other side of that last wall works fine. Of course... ymmv. - Chris > "mleuck" wrote... > > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > - Chris The vanishing contacts from DSC are made by Secure Wireless. I've had a couple up and running since they came out and they work great, the magnet is very powerful > "mleuck" wrote... > > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > - Chris Ever tried the recessed sensors? "mleuck" wrote... > > > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Ever tried the recessed sensors? Actually, I have acquired a hatred for the recessed contacts. Though not as much as my hatred for other products (ademco panels for one) Perhaps it was the low quality drill bits I was using when they first came out. Ever use a spade bit that large (3/4"?) and try to get a good, even, level hole drilled? Perhaps it's the fact that the end cap doesn't want to stay on securely. Or perhaps it's the fact that you'll never get the contact out in the future to replace it. You may not even be able to get the board out of the casing to replace the battery. I suppose the best solution here would be to use the optional end cap that gets screwed onto the door frame and drill a little too large intentionally. Although the last one I installed had to go into the door with the magnet in the frame. It was very easy on that one, but probably not the best option for the longevity of the contact. Ironically, this was a place where we were trying to keep people from breaking out, and all the surface contacts were either destroyed or thrown out the window into a forest. The only one the has survived is that recessed contact. - Chris > Perhaps it was the low quality drill bits I was using when they first > came out. Ever use a spade bit that large (3/4"?) and try to get a [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > contact. > - Chris Try the spade bit, and if it starts to wander, stop. Finish with a hole saw to keep the hole true. Try the transmitter case, if you have to force it, stop. Use the spade bit again to ream the hole a little at a time til your case fits perfectly. Use a little ALEX caulk or silicone to hold in place if necessary. Signaturejs Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote. > > "mleuck" wrote... > > > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Ever tried the recessed sensors? Yes but not long term >> Ever tried the recessed sensors? > >Yes but not long term WTF, you're answering your own questions now? Did that big, fat, fist shake your concentration? > >> Ever tried the recessed sensors? > > >Yes but not long term > > WTF, you're answering your own questions now? Did that big, fat, fist shake > your concentration? The recessed sensor question wasn't mine >The recessed sensor question wasn't mine Really? It sure looks like you asked "Ever tried the recessed sensors?".... Hmmmm.... Hard to refute this: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C59b3659a-d167-4d23-a8f1 -7d567dbbc86a%40f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com%3E >> "mleuck" wrote... >> > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Ever tried the recessed sensors? I have used them, nad they work well. > >> "mleuck" wrote... > >> > > Also, can I get door contacts without telescopic antennas? [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > I have used them, nad they work well. Tell it to G Morgan, apparently he's the one asking :) >Wow even G Morgan can install one of these It beats what you like to install: http://tinyurl.com/ofaxz9 > It beats what you like to install: http://tinyurl.com/ofaxz9 I bet you have that page bookmarked. Signaturejs > > It beats what you like to install:http://tinyurl.com/ofaxz9 > > I bet you have that page bookmarked. > > -- > js And I'm sure they have his credit card memorized by now >> > It beats what you like to install:http://tinyurl.com/ofaxz9 >> >> I bet you have that page bookmarked. >And I'm sure they have his credit card memorized by now Are you denying you're a flaming homo? > Are you denying you're a flaming homo? I wonder where that expression, "flaming" came from. I've seen a few but never one that was smoking, much less flaming. :^) >> Are you denying you're a flaming homo? > >I wonder where that expression, "flaming" came from. I've seen a few but >never one that was smoking, much less flaming. :^) Maybe Liberace inspired the term with his outfits. ?? > Maybe Liberace inspired the term with his outfits. ?? Probably so. SignatureRegards, Robert L Bass ==============================> Bass Home Electronics DIY Alarm and Home Automation Store http://www.bassburglaralarms.com Sales & Service 941-870-2310 Fax 941-870-3252 ==============================> >> Are you denying you're a flaming homo? > > I wonder where that expression, "flaming" came from. I've seen a few but > never one that was smoking, much less flaming. :^) You could try turning the lights on, if that doesn't help then try one of those gizmo's that Grahams hawking. Doug > You could try turning the lights on... And find out what you look like? Naah. >> You could try turning the lights on... > > And find out what you look like? Naah. That's just wishful thinking on your part Doug > That's just wishful thinking on your part You flatter yourself. Oh well, I guess someone has to. >Are you denying you're a flaming homo? Silence speaks volumes. We have our answer boys (and "boys"). >> It beats what you like to install: http://tinyurl.com/ofaxz9 > >I bet you have that page bookmarked. No, that's my online store. I sell more plastic fists then any other online dealer. My sales volume is so much that I get better wholesale prices then everybody else in the world on ball gags. > >> It beats what you like to install:http://tinyurl.com/ofaxz9 > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > dealer. My sales volume is so much that I get better wholesale prices then > everybody else in the world on ball gags. And I'm sure you test them frequently before putting them online >And I'm sure you test them frequently before putting them online Then how do you explain this, moron? Message-ID: <59b3659a-d167-4d23-a8f1-7d567dbbc86a@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> > >And I'm sure you test them frequently before putting them online > > Then how do you explain this, moron? What is "this"? >> >And I'm sure you test them frequently before putting them online >> >> Then how do you explain this, moron? > >What is "this"? The message ID of the post you made that read "Ever tried the recessed sensors?".... Now you're denying you wrote it. Here is irrefutable proof you wrote it: ( I see you cancelled it with Google) http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C59b3659a-d167-4d23-a8f1 -7d567dbbc86a%40f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com%3E > >> >And I'm sure you test them frequently before putting them online > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C59b3659a-d16... I never canceled any post, and I didn't write that >I never canceled any post, and I didn't write that You're a liar or you have a fan impersonating you then. It appears this imposter also lives in the same area as you: http://www.ip2location.com/66.25.41.224 Here is the header from the Howard Knight archive: (you wrote the message, just admit it) Path: ...!postnews.google.com!f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: mleuck <m.leuck@tx.rr.com> Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms Subject: Re: Sell LCD telephone Burglar Alarm Systems Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 16 Message-ID: <59b3659a-d167-4d23-a8f1-7d567dbbc86a@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> References: <1ad57c70-6d45-49ac-9d2d-c5a13865160a@t10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <fbd0f389-beeb-445e-9f5c-aaab2637d55d@s21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <LteVl.30392$PH1.15179@edtnps82> <21d77d50-2a20-41f1-bc12-f97cd36d31c4@f19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <l6FVl.30521$PH1.10806@edtnps82> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.25.41.224 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244088834 1999 127.0.0.1 (4 Jun 2009 04:13:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.25.41.224; posting-account=KbrH6woAAAB66nsgujqvJYrDLjr7MuEN User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 1917 > >I never canceled any post, and I didn't write that > > You're a liar or you have a fan impersonating you then. It appears this > imposter also lives in the same area as you:http://www.ip2location.com/66.25.41.224 You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot >> You're a liar or you have a fan impersonating you... > > You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot I thought he was being polite by leaving that option out. On Jun 19, 10:25�am, "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@BassBurglarAlarms.com> wrote: > >> You're a liar or you have a fan impersonating you... > > > You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot > > I thought he was being polite by leaving that option out. ;-) > On Jun 19, 10:25 am, "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@BassBurglarAlarms.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > ;-) Oh look Jim's right behind Robert, that might make Frank mad On Jun 19, 12:48 pm, Jim <alarmi...@aol.com> wrote: > On Jun 19, 10:25 am, "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@BassBurglarAlarms.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > ;-) Oh look Jim's right behind Robert, that might make Frank mad they went from hating each other to a cluster f.ck. change you can believe in? >> I thought he was being polite by leaving that option out. > > ;-) Oh look Jim's right behind Robert, that might make Frank mad I suspect Frank, like Jim, appreciated the humor (or, in his case, the humour). You did leave yourself wide open for the retort. >You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot What? Are you doing the 'Mark-Like-A-Nova' now because I shut you down and called you a liar? > >You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot > > What? Are you doing the 'Mark-Like-A-Nova' now because I shut you down and > called you a liar? Keep dreaming in that alcohol-fueled haze, you did no such thing >> What? Are you doing the 'Mark-Like-A-Nova' now because I shut you down and >> called you a liar? > >Keep dreaming in that alcohol-fueled haze, you did no such thing I don't drink. Anyway, you wrote the post in question. I don't know why I bother, but it's the principle of the matter now. You wrote it, and you're lying about it. I would call out anybody who lies (ask your buddy in FL) here, and you're it. So.... Maybe someone else will step in and prove me wrong, but we both know that's not happening because I'm right. > >> What? Are you doing the 'Mark-Like-A-Nova' now because I shut you down and > >> called you a liar? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > So.... I don't know why you bother either, must be the booze > Maybe someone else will step in and prove me wrong, but we both know that's > not happening because I'm right. No it's not happening because nobody else is interested >I don't know why you bother either, must be the booze Again, I don't drink. >> Maybe someone else will step in and prove me wrong, but we both know that's >> not happening because I'm right. > >No it's not happening because nobody else is interested Probably. I'm barely interested myself. I just thought it's amazing that you continue to deny something that has been proven with irrefutable evidence. Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would be tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy. > >I don't know why you bother either, must be the booze > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Probably. I'm barely interested myself. I just thought it's amazing that you > continue to deny something that has been proven with irrefutable evidence. Maybe because it hasn't been proven with irrefutable evidence, I've dealt with several of the ITI version recessed sensors when they first came out so I doubt I'd ever ask someone else how well they work. You seem more than barely interested > Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would be > tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy. And if I recall you and Frank were at the head of the pack at that kind of stuff >Maybe because it hasn't been proven with irrefutable evidence, I've >dealt with several of the ITI version recessed sensors when they first >came out so I doubt I'd ever ask someone else how well they work. Okay then, what explanation do you have for the post in question? Is it a very well done forgery? >You seem more than barely interested I am more interested in the thought process a person like you has. It's hard to imagine someone blatantly lying & denying while faced with hard evidence. It's mostly curiosity regarding the psychology behind your deception, not the content of the lie itself. >> Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would be >> tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy. > >And if I recall you and Frank were at the head of the pack at that >kind of stuff Yeah. > >Maybe because it hasn't been proven with irrefutable evidence, I've > >dealt with several of the ITI version recessed sensors when they first [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > It's mostly curiosity regarding the psychology behind your deception, not the > content of the lie itself. Fingerprints on a murder weapon is hard evidence Your DNA on a dead body is hard evidence A copied text file or link to a web post isn't hard evidence, if you really want to examine bizarre thought processes start with your own > >> Back in the day, if the target was 'you-know-who', this incident would be > >> tantamount to the Kennedy assassination/conspiracy. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Yeah. At least we agree on that >Fingerprints on a murder weapon is hard evidence >Your DNA on a dead body is hard evidence We're not talking about murder, please stay focused. >A copied text file or link to a web post isn't hard evidence, if you >really want to examine bizarre thought processes start with your own It is when we are talking about the authenticity of a Usenet post. There never will be DNA evidence, Mark. >> Yeah. > >At least we agree on that Somewhat, yes. I just don't want to deviate from the matter at hand just yet. So, tell me your theory as to how that message with your name and header properties all over it showed up please.... > >Fingerprints on a murder weapon is hard evidence > >Your DNA on a dead body is hard evidence [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > So, tell me your theory as to how that message with your name and header > properties all over it showed up please.... Sure, my theory is someone else wrote it and it was included along with the rest of someone's post that I replied to. I should think to most people that be common sense. BTW Who is helping you will all those big words you typed? >Sure, my theory is someone else wrote it and it was included along >with the rest of someone's post that I replied to. I should think to >most people that be common sense. Nope. The text in question was not quoted text. Try again. >BTW Who is helping you will all those big words you typed? Which words would you like help with? > >Sure, my theory is someone else wrote it and it was included along > >with the rest of someone's post that I replied to. I should think to > >most people that be common sense. > > Nope. The text in question was not quoted text. Try again. Don't you think it's a little odd that all this bothers you so much? >Don't you think it's a little odd that all this bothers you so much? Yes, it's more than a little odd. So, just admit you posted it and I can move on. > >Don't you think it's a little odd that all this bothers you so much? > > Yes, it's more than a little odd. > > So, just admit you posted it and I can move on. LOL! uh NO >> So, just admit you posted it and I can move on. > >LOL! uh NO Here are two more sites that archived that post of yours: http://www.homekb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/security-alarms/9719/Sell-LCD-telephone-Bur glar-Alarm-Systems http://www.news2mail.com/subject/12938879.html > >> So, just admit you posted it and I can move on. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://www.news2mail.com/subject/12938879.html They made it up too, it's a conspiracy >> Here are two more sites that archived that post of yours: >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >They made it up too, it's a conspiracy Who do you think is conspiring to get you? Frank? > >> Here are two more sites that archived that post of yours: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Who do you think is conspiring to get you? Frank? Frank isn't that smart so it has to be you >> >They made it up too, it's a conspiracy >> >> Who do you think is conspiring to get you? Frank? > >Frank isn't that smart so it has to be you It is not me, I'm the one investigating it. Why you gotta be such a hater on Frank? >>>> They made it up too, it's a conspiracy >>> Who do you think is conspiring to get you? Frank? >> Frank isn't that smart so it has to be you > > It is not me, I'm the one investigating it. Why you gotta be such a hater on > Frank? I'm better looking in shorts. > >> >They made it up too, it's a conspiracy > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > It is not me, I'm the one investigating it. Why you gotta be such a hater on > Frank? I never said I hated Frank, it's just that you are obviously smarter than he is >> It is not me, I'm the one investigating it. Why you gotta be such a hater on >> Frank? > >I never said I hated Frank, it's just that you are obviously smarter >than he is Maybe so, maybe not... Flattery will not work. You wrote the post, then realized you answered your own question, then cancelled it with GoogleGroups. It's an honest mistake, but lying about it is not honest at all. > >> It is not me, I'm the one investigating it. Why you gotta be such a hater on > >> Frank? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > cancelled it with GoogleGroups. It's an honest mistake, but lying about it is > not honest at all. Canceled it with GoogleGroups? where is the proof with that oh enlightened one? >Canceled it with GoogleGroups? where is the proof with that oh >enlightened one? Hey lookie here!! It magically reappeared.... http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.alarms/msg/08c19e5db0d3c8f5 Now you can not deny posting it, sucka. > >Canceled it with GoogleGroups? where is the proof with that oh > >enlightened one? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Now you can not deny posting it, sucka. So now you say a message I somehow deleted reappeared...... > > >Canceled it with GoogleGroups? where is the proof with that oh > > >enlightened one? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > So now you say a message I somehow deleted reappeared......< Was that before or after the same sex oral encounter? On Jun 30, 11:47 pm, too fat for a ladder <alarminst...@aol.com> wrote: > > > >Canceled it with GoogleGroups? where is the proof with that oh > > > >enlightened one? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Was that before or after the same sex oral encounter? He said somewhere he doesn't drink..... >Canceled it with GoogleGroups? where is the proof with that oh >enlightened one? No need, here is proof you posted it... Unalterable headers from Google herself: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.alarms/msg/08c19e5db0d3c8f5?dmode=source > >> Here are two more sites that archived that post of yours: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Who do you think is conspiring to get you? Frank? < Maybe it's someone from one of the gay groups you think he belongs to. What's up with that off the wall accusation anyway? You've hinted numerous times that Mark is a little light in the loafers but never brought proof to the table. Maybe it's Mike or Jake taking a swipe from the grave. It could be Rodney using a teleprompter. It could be Mark pretending not to be Mark trolling Mark just to get a rise out of you. It could be part of Cooper's plot to overthrow the industry though his special technology (forget what it was called). If it bothers you that much just blame it on Bob Campbell. He's way too nice to people which leads me to believe he leads a secret life as an internet scumbag. >Maybe it's someone from one of the gay groups you think he belongs to. >What's up with that off the wall accusation anyway? You've hinted >numerous times that Mark is a little light in the loafers but never >brought proof to the table. I heard him mumbling something about being gay while he was blowing me. > >Maybe it's someone from one of the gay groups you think he belongs to. > >What's up with that off the wall accusation anyway? You've hinted > >numerous times that Mark is a little light in the loafers but never > >brought proof to the table. > > I heard him mumbling something about being gay while he was blowing me. Some guy was blowing you? That answers a few questions >Some guy was blowing you? Pay attention you pansy, I said YOU were the blower. > That answers a few questions It doesn't answer why you are lying. btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. > btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I > certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. Are you sure? There's a pic of him in his "riding shorts" on Stevens' website. >> btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I >> certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. > >Are you sure? There's a pic of him in his "riding shorts" on Stevens' >website. Yeah, that's creepy alright. He also thinks Mark is smart and posts behind him every chance he gets. I wonder... > >> btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I > >> certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Yeah, that's creepy alright. He also thinks Mark is smart and posts behind > him every chance he gets. I wonder... You seem to wonder a lot of things >>> btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I >>> certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Yeah, that's creepy alright. He also thinks Mark is smart and posts behind > him every chance he gets. I wonder... He does what behind him? :^) On Jul 1, 1:12 pm, "Robert L Bass" <Sa...@BassBurglarAlarms.com> wrote: > > btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I > > certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. > > Are you sure? There's a pic of him in his "riding shorts" on Stevens' > website. Yup healthy and wearing riding shorts, not a thing wrong with my lungs > Yup healthy and wearing riding shorts, not a thing wrong with my lungs All kidding aside, I hope you stay that way. > >Some guy was blowing you? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I > certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. Well thank god for that, you can now continue riding RLB's butt > >Some guy was blowing you? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > btw... even if I was gay (not that there's anything wrong with that) I > certainly wouldn't want anything to do with you, fruitcake. < OK let's stop the innuendos (which most of you probably think is an Italian suppository), and just tell it the way you see it. Are you, yes or no, calling Mark a homosexual, and do you, yes or no, have any information to support your belief, or is this just a label you have thrown on him in retaliation for you being labeled a wino? > > >Some guy was blowing you? > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > have any information to support your belief, or is this just a label > you have thrown on him in retaliation for you being labeled a wino? G has admitted being a dunk in the past and now dreams about getting blow jobs from men whereas I never said I was gay Ever tried the recessed sensors? >G has admitted being a dunk in the past and now dreams about getting >blow jobs from men whereas I never said I was gay This is obviously a forgery, right Mark? >Ever tried the recessed sensors? Yes. Stop asking that. >OK let's stop the innuendos (which most of you probably think is an >Italian suppository), and just tell it the way you see it. >Are you, yes or no, calling Mark a homosexual, Yes. > and do you, yes or no, >have any information to support your belief, No. Just a hunch. >or is this just a label >you have thrown on him in retaliation for you being labeled a wino? Actually I only engaged him because he started this thread with an unprovoked, and unfunny, flame. "Wow even G Morgan can install one of these" After that it just became an opportunity to tell him I think he's a queer (not that there's anything wrong with that, a person's sexual orientation is nobody's business but their own). He may not even know it yet, last I heard he was just experimenting with ladies hose. > >OK let's stop the innuendos (which most of you probably think is an > >Italian suppository), and just tell it the way you see it. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > nobody's business but their own). He may not even know it yet, last I heard > he was just experimenting with ladies hose. Apparently you are the expert on gay stuff >Apparently you are the expert on gay stuff No, not really, I call 'em as I see 'em. Let's get back to your lying problem, then we can address your repressed gayness. > >Apparently you are the expert on gay stuff > > No, not really, I call 'em as I see 'em. > > Let's get back to your lying problem, then we can address your repressed > gayness. With what you've said so far I don't think I'm the one with any repressed gayness >With what you've said so far I don't think I'm the one with any >repressed gayness Your opinion is noted. Now, why are you lying about posting stuff? > >With what you've said so far I don't think I'm the one with any > >repressed gayness > > Your opinion is noted. > > Now, why are you lying about posting stuff? I'm not lying Ever tried the recessed sensors? >I'm not lying Yes you are. You are a big, fat, liar. Nanny-nanny, boo-boo. >Ever tried the recessed sensors? Yes. Stop asking me that. > >I'm not lying > > Yes you are. You are a big, fat, liar. Nanny-nanny, boo-boo. I thought you were concentrating more on the gay stuff? Something about people blowing you or something > Yes. Stop asking me that. Asking you what? >I thought you were concentrating more on the gay stuff? No, I was focused mainly on your inability to tell the truth. > Something >about people blowing you or something That was you. >> Yes. Stop asking me that. > >Asking you what? Ever tried the reassessed sensors? > >I thought you were concentrating more on the gay stuff? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > That was you. I didn't say that you did > >> Yes. Stop asking me that. > > >Asking you what? > > Ever tried the reassessed sensors? Yes I have thank you for asking >> Ever tried the reassessed sensors? > >Yes I have thank you for asking Yeah I know. You already answered your own question after you asked it yourself. >> >Some guy was blowing you? >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > have any information to support your belief, or is this just a label > you have thrown on him in retaliation for you being labeled a wino? Its just wishful thinking on Grahams part Doug >>You forgot the 3rd option: You could be an idiot > > What? Are you doing the 'Mark-Like-A-Nova' now because I shut you down > and > called you a liar? It just doesn't have the same ring to it as the Bass-O-Nova Doug |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.