Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneralRural LivingHome AutomationSecurity AlarmsConstructionRepairPlumbingCleaningPest ControlLawn and Garden

Homeowner Forum / Security Alarms / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ADT lawsuit

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bob - 14 Jul 2008 02:06 GMT
http://newsmax.com/entertainment/people_lansing_friedkin/2008/07/11/112076.html

wonder why they dropped the suit?
Frank Olson - 14 Jul 2008 04:21 GMT
> http://newsmax.com/entertainment/people_lansing_friedkin/2008/07/11/112076.html 
>
> wonder why they dropped the suit?

ADT paid their insurance deductible?  :-)
Bob - 15 Jul 2008 04:29 GMT
>> http://newsmax.com/entertainment/people_lansing_friedkin/2008/07/11/112076.html 
>>
>> wonder why they dropped the suit?
>
> ADT paid their insurance deductible?  :-)
that must be that verified response stuff.  eh.  2 hours to verify.
woow .  I wonder how much a month for that?
Frank Olson - 15 Jul 2008 05:49 GMT
>>> http://newsmax.com/entertainment/people_lansing_friedkin/2008/07/11/112076.html 
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that must be that verified response stuff.  eh.  2 hours to verify. woow
> .  I wonder how much a month for that?

I can recall an incident involving a monitoring station in Edmonton.
The thieves hit at the same time the station was undergoing a software
upgrade to SIMS II.  The Morse receiver processed an "offline" signal as
a low priority "trouble" instead of a high priority "line cut" because
the signal tables had to be manually translated for it all to work (a
crucial "step" the station manager had "missed").  As a consequence, the
operator missed the fact that the jewelry store's alarm communications
had been compromised.  Of course, the station "management" blamed the
operator and sacked her to demonstrate to the customer that it was
"operator error" instead of their gross negligence.

ADT has a "guarantee" in most of the new contracts I've read where they
state they'll cover your insurance deductible if for any reason the
system doesn't work "as advertised".  If the jewelry and other high
value goods hadn't been "value formed", then I can also imagine that
such a "high profile" customer would get "extra" on top of that.  Don't
kid yourself.  ADT "paid" for it all in the end...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.