 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsGeneralRural LivingHome AutomationSecurity AlarmsConstructionRepairPlumbingCleaningPest ControlLawn and Garden |
Homeowner Forum / Lawn and Garden / November 2007serious tree problems addressed
Many tree problems are associated with the following: They are Case Sensitive. Troubles in the Rhizosphere http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/shigo/RHIZO.html Unhealthy Trees from the Nursery / Improper Planting http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/sub1.html and Look up "Tree Planting" http://www.treedictionary.com Improper Mulching - http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/sub3.html and http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/M/ Look up "Mulch" Improper Pruning http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/tree_pruning Improper Fertilization (See A Touch of Chemistry) http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/shigo/CHEM.html Tree Farming and Related Problems http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2003/SOUND/ Sincerely, John A. Keslick, Jr. Consulting Arborist http://home.ccil.org/~treeman and www.treedictionary.com Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology. Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us that we are not the boss. > Many tree problems are associated with the following: They are Case > Sensitive. Was this a response to a question that only you can see? >> Many tree problems are associated with the following: They are Case >> Sensitive. > > Was this a response to a question that only you can see? Nope, just the standard once a week self promotional garbage. >>> Many tree problems are associated with the following: They are Case >>> Sensitive. >> >> Was this a response to a question that only you can see? > > Nope, just the standard once a week self promotional garbage. I thought it was his answer to a question about gardening tools. :-) >>>> Many tree problems are associated with the following: They are Case >>>> Sensitive. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I thought it was his answer to a question about gardening tools. :-) At least he's not repeatedly asking for us to fill out a survey. >> Was this a response to a question that only you can see? YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Obviously you do not understand common problems trees suffer from today. So I am glad you are not providing information to people. I have not only looked, I have seen. I do not see you offering sound suggestions to people with problems with trees. I care about trees and their associates. Please define what you mean when you say "garbage". > Nope, just the standard once a week self promotional garbage. I don't think you had any friends when you were a kid. Where is your helpful suggestions to people who are responsible for trees with respect to trees and their associates? I.e., on the following topics. Troubles in the Rhizosphere Trees from the Nursery Tree Planting Mulching Pruning Fertilization (A Touch of Chemistry) Tree Farming and Related Problems You say self promoting. What am I selling? Sincerely, John A. Keslick, Jr. Consulting Arborist http://home.ccil.org/~treeman and www.treedictionary.com Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology. Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us that we are not the boss. >>> Was this a response to a question that only you can see? > > YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Obviously you do not understand common problems > trees suffer from today. Listen, Einstein: When someone responds to a newsgroup message, the subject line of the response usually begins with Re: Subject. Your message did not contain this telltale clue. So, it was obvious that you were NOT responding to someone's question. Here's what really happened: Nobody had asked a tree question in a while, and that made you feel unwanted, so you posted your usual cut & paste job just to see your name "in writing" once again. Now, sit down and shut the f.ck up. >>>> Was this a response to a question that only you can see? >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > did not contain this telltale clue. So, it was obvious that you were NOT > responding to someone's question. It is a NEWS FLASH, got a problem with that? > Here's what really happened: Nobody had asked a tree question in a while, > and that made you feel unwanted, so you posted your usual cut & paste job > just to see your name "in writing" once again. You just explained yourself. > Now, sit down and shut the f.ck up. Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses. I am not here to please you in any way shape or form. Keep talking!!!!!!!!!  SignatureSincerely, John A. Keslick, Jr. Consulting Arborist http://home.ccil.org/~treeman and www.treedictionary.com Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology. Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us that we are not the boss. >>>>> Was this a response to a question that only you can see? >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > It is a NEWS FLASH, got a problem with that? A news flash? That's a new excuse. > "symplastless" <symplastless@comcast.net> wrote in message >> It is a NEWS FLASH, got a problem with that? > > A news flash? That's a new excuse. Excuse? I do not answer to you. You are not the boss. What are you a nut? Sincerely, John A. Keslick, Jr. Consulting Arborist http://home.ccil.org/~treeman and www.treedictionary.com Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology. Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us that we are not the boss. >Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses. Um, f.ck, sh.t, doody, crap, a.shole, prick, scumbag, mo fo, pee pee, f.ck stick. Too bad I'm not a man. I can't be judged now. >>Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses. > > Um, f.ck, sh.t, doody, crap, a.shole, prick, scumbag, mo fo, pee pee, > f.ck stick. > > Too bad I'm not a man. I can't be judged now. :-) >>>Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >:-) Oh yeah? :) :) :) TAKE THAT! JoeSpareBedroom;762673]"Jangchub" Jangchub@sakadawa.org wrote in messag news:2jktk311fmq6k09kr86b8atnr3ukujqe23@4ax.com...- On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:44:09 -0500, "symplastless" symplastless@comcast.net wrote: - Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses.- Um, ****, sh.t, doody, crap, a.shole, prick, scumbag, mo fo, pee pee, **** stick. Too bad I'm not a man. I can't be judged now.- :-) first off i dont think the garbage language is needed here this is gardening forum not a place for fowl and vulgar language. second of all i would like to thank john for posting his information o this site as it has helped me with a number of trees not only on our ow farm but also with a few that a friend of ours has. without johns information i know for sure that those trees would hav died. the location of their trees were not only wrong but also the amt o mulch used was not good, they had way to much. so just because he posts now and again is no reason to go blasting of or swearing at him its uncalled for also its against the rules of thi group. im hoping that those doing it will stop as its uncalled for. after all we are all gardeners are we know and its always good to hav good information onhand incase we need it:). cyaaaaa sockiescat:) -- sockiescat >JoeSpareBedroom;762673]"Jangchub" Jangchub@sakadawa.org wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] >good information onhand incase we need it:). cyaaaaa, >sockiescat:). Anyone with the name containing "sock" in it is suspicious. I can see you have your own versions of vulgar. Actually, every word I said could be seen as vulgar, but you are selective. That tells me the word a.shole, prick, scumbag, and sh.t are okay with you. Interesting. One word, grammar. >> Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses. > > Um, f.ck, sh.t, doody, crap, a.shole, prick, scumbag, mo fo, pee pee, > f.ck stick. > > Too bad I'm not a man. I can't be judged now. Oh, girl, you so bad!!!!!!!!!! > >Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses. > > Um, f.ck, sh.t, doody, crap, a.shole, prick, scumbag, mo fo, pee pee, > f.ck stick. > > Too bad I'm not a man. I can't be judged now. Bad taste. Bad judgement. Deplorable. SignatureBilly Bush & Cheney, Behind Bars >> >Bad words. Judge a man by the words that he uses. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Bad taste. Bad judgement. Deplorable. supercalifragilisticexpialadocious. >>> Was this a response to a question that only you can see? > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > You say self promoting. What am I selling? Your own ego. You call yourself a "consulting arborist", show us your associations. Beware a so called tree biologist that never studied biology. "D. Staples" <forester66@yahoo.com> wrote in >> You say self promoting. What am I selling? > > Your own ego. You call yourself a "consulting arborist", show us your > associations. > > Beware a so called tree biologist that never studied biology. NO! Beware of so called foresters who do not understand the ecological stages of trees with respect to the chemistry between them and their associates!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SignatureSincerely, John A. Keslick, Jr. Consulting Arborist http://home.ccil.org/~treeman and www.treedictionary.com Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology. Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us that we are not the boss. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.