Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneralRural LivingHome AutomationSecurity AlarmsConstructionRepairPlumbingCleaningPest ControlLawn and Garden

Homeowner Forum / Construction / October 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Removing a 9' load bearing wall

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MDA - 05 Oct 2008 09:39 GMT
I'd like to remove a load bearing internal wall by putting a beam in the
attic and attaching it to the ceiling joists from above.

I know this was general topic was discussed in April of 2008.
"Dave in Houston" posted URL's for some pictures. They're gone.
Can someone show me how this has been done before?

The wall is on the upper floor of a 2-story home.
The wall is near the center of the house, approx 9' long.
The roof does not bear on the wall.
The wall supports 2x6 ceiling joists, 1/2 inch ceiling sheetrock, and
attic insulation.  That's all.

The attic is pretty accessible.  I can put a beam up there, assemble it,
and attach it.

I'm very interested in advice about sizing the beam and attaching it to
the joists.  I'd like to see what has worked for someone else.

I'm officially an engineer, so I understand the need to provide support
all the way to the foundation.  No problem.

Thanks for your help!
-- Mark

-------------------------------------

##-----------------------------------------------#
Delivered via  http://www.thestuccocompany.com
Building Construction and Maintenance Foru
Web and RSS access to your favorite newsgroup -
alt.building.construction - 14658 messages and counting
##-----------------------------------------------##
DanG - 05 Oct 2008 13:19 GMT
Simple rule of thumb - nominal lumber size when doubled as a
header = span.  So, a double 2x6 will span 6 feet.  Your opening
will require double 2x10.  15" pieces of 2x2 can be installed
vertically to that the top is nailed to your new 2x10 and the
bottom is nailed to the 2x6.  Repeat for all 2x6 involved.  As you
have noted, solid block the ends of the 2x10s and add studs as
required.

If it will make you feel better, here is a header span table from
the Southern Pine institute:
http://newstore.southernpine.com/cgi-bin/newsopine/product?;5;

Signature

______________________________
Keep the whole world singing . . . .
DanG  (remove the sevens)
dgriff237@7cox.net

> I'd like to remove a load bearing internal wall by putting a
> beam in the
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> alt.building.construction - 14658 messages and counting!
> ##-----------------------------------------------##
MDA - 06 Oct 2008 18:45 GMT
MDA had written this in response to
http://www.thestuccocompany.com/construction/Re-Removing-a-9-load-bearing-wall-1
5382-.htm

:
Thank-you!

This is much simpler than the alternative system of cutting the ends off
joists, installing a beam, and atttaching joists with joist hangers.

What do you recommend for number of nails, size of nails, and spacing of
nails?

-- Mark
mda53226(at)yahoo(dot)com

-------------------------------------

> Simple rule of thumb - nominal lumber size when doubled as a
> header = span.  So, a double 2x6 will span 6 feet.  Your opening
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> have noted, solid block the ends of the 2x10s and add studs as
> required.

> If it will make you feel better, here is a header span table from
> the Southern Pine institute:
> http://newstore.southernpine.com/cgi-bin/newsopine/product?;5;

##-----------------------------------------------##
Delivered via  http://www.thestuccocompany.com/
Building Construction and Maintenance Forum
Web and RSS access to your favorite newsgroup -
alt.building.construction - 14660 messages and counting!
##-----------------------------------------------##
dpb - 06 Oct 2008 18:59 GMT
...
> This is much simpler than the alternative system of cutting the ends off
> joists, installing a beam, and atttaching joists with joist hangers.
>
> What do you recommend for number of nails, size of nails, and spacing of
> nails?
...
Not really, all it does is switch the order of things...

The problem is still there's not enough information to ensure you've
accounted for the loading correctly but _assuming_ your assessment of
the structure's integrity is close (but asking these questions here
makes one wonder), it's still hanging the joists and hangers would still
be the better solution.  But, I'd still recommend you get a professional
opinion on the actual situation before proceeding, engineer or no--you
obviously are something other than civil/structural/architectural in
specialization.  (As am I, so that's not a slam...)

--
mda - 07 Oct 2008 05:32 GMT
mda had written this in response to
http://www.thestuccocompany.com/construction/Re-Removing-a-9-load-bearing-wall-1
5385-.htm

:
Thanks, dpb --

You're right, I'm a mechanical engineer.  I work in the world of steel and
plastics.  I'm not familiar with estimating the strength of a nailed joint
in wood.

Was thinking there must be a rule-of-thumb for estimating the strength of
a 2x2 nailed to a 2x10. . . and a guideline for nail size and spacing to
get a good joint without weakening the wood.

Was also thinking it would be good to apply glue to the 2x2's before
nailing.  The glue joint would carry the loaded with shear stress, and
glue is very strong in that direction.

I'm not totally clueless.  Am simply asking questions to collect the best
ideas before developing a plan.  (The "expert" at the building supply
store told me I could only put a beam UNDER the ceiling.  There is no way
to put it above the ceiling.  You folks are proving him wrong.)  I came
here to ask because Google suggested this was a good place to get opinions.

-- Mark

##-----------------------------------------------##
Delivered via  http://www.thestuccocompany.com/
Building Construction and Maintenance Forum
Web and RSS access to your favorite newsgroup -
alt.building.construction - 14662 messages and counting!
##-----------------------------------------------##
RicodJour - 07 Oct 2008 17:46 GMT
> You're right, I'm a mechanical engineer.  I work in the world of steel and
> plastics.  I'm not familiar with estimating the strength of a nailed joint
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> to put it above the ceiling.  You folks are proving him wrong.)  I came
> here to ask because Google suggested this was a good place to get opinions.

2x2s are problematic.  The wood used in 2x2s is often sketchy.  Solid
wood of a small cross section is prone to splitting when numerous
framing nails are used.  In your situation you'll probably be using at
least five or six nails per 2x2 where it's attached to the 2x6 - in
5.5" you'll have six nails in a 1.5" wide area...not good.  It would
be far preferable to use metal strapping - check the Simpson Strongtie
catalog.

Your question omits necessary information - joist span, attic height
(indicating probable load), etc.  You first have to determine the
total design load per joist and use that to compute the size of the
beam.  I no longer use solid sawn lumber for beam application in
remodeling.  LVLs are far stronger and do not shrink.  Shrinkage can
lead to cracked finishes and uneven settling.

Look into the LVLs and using metal strapping.  The metal strapping
should preferably be wrapped over the top of the beam and under the
bottom of the joist.  The number of nails is dependent on the load -
divide the total individual joist load by the shear loaded strength of
the nail and add one nail.  Use the same number of nails on either end
of the strap.  Simpson's web site will list the holding power of their
joist hanger nails.

R
Rick Samuel - 07 Oct 2008 07:24 GMT
> I'd like to remove a load bearing internal wall by putting a beam in the
> attic and attaching it to the ceiling joists from above.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Thanks for your help!
> -- Mark

"Hurricane clips" would cost more then a 2x2 to hang the joists from.  But
may be easier to install.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.