Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneralRural LivingHome AutomationSecurity AlarmsConstructionRepairPlumbingCleaningPest ControlLawn and Garden

Homeowner Forum / Construction / April 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DJW - 20 Apr 2007 14:02 GMT
What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?

With the standard 3 foot three tab shingles what is the best order of
courses to stager the joints?
After the starter course I use a full three tab shingles. Then cut 6
inches off the end tab of the next course. At this point is where I am
not sure what to do. Do I cut a full tab off for the number three
course? And use a two full tab section. Then go to a cut down t 6 inch
and a full tab for number 4 course. And then repeat? At course five to
8 and so on?
bdeditch - 20 Apr 2007 20:16 GMT
> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> and a full tab for number 4 course. And then repeat? At course five to
> 8 and so on?

I have seen where they cut 6" off and I have also seen where they cut
8" and then the next row 4". I think its up to you how you want it to
look. I am sure that you will get more replies on this subject.
HerHusband - 21 Apr 2007 17:22 GMT
> I have seen where they cut 6" off and I have also seen where they cut
> 8" and then the next row 4".

That's the approach I use.

Start with a full shingle, cut off 4" on the next row, cut off 8" on the
next row, then start over with a full shingle on the next row.

This gives a slightly less formal "rustic" appearance, but more
importantly, it's better at hiding slight alignment errors between rows
(vertical joints only line up every 3 rows instead of every other row).

Anthony
longshot - 21 Apr 2007 19:33 GMT
>> I have seen where they cut 6" off and I have also seen where they cut
>> 8" and then the next row 4".
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Anthony

I always measure the entire roof first, just make sure you wont end up with
a little sliver of a tab on the other end. other than that, 1/2 tab/ full
tab... repeat
Dave - 21 Apr 2007 06:21 GMT
> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> and a full tab for number 4 course. And then repeat? At course five to
> 8 and so on?

Instructions for layout for shingles are printed on the plastic wrap they
come in.  Doing something else voids the warranty.
Signature

Dave

Apathy and denial are close cousins

longshot - 21 Apr 2007 19:32 GMT
>> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Instructions for layout for shingles are printed on the plastic wrap they
> come in.  Doing something else voids the warranty.

The warranty is completely worthless anyway. Ever see an application where
every nail hit the tar strip? won't happen with nail guns & roofers knocking
out 10 square a day.
marson - 21 Apr 2007 21:03 GMT
> >> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> every nail hit the tar strip? won't happen with nail guns & roofers knocking
> out 10 square a day.

nails aren't supposed to hit the tar strip anyway.  The tar strip is
for sealing the tabs above to the shingle below.  I actually got
spanked once for having nails in the tar strip.  But your point is
right.  the warranty is worthless.  Unless it's some sort of a class
action for a defective batch of shingles, shingle companies just blame
the installer.
Matt Whiting - 22 Apr 2007 03:21 GMT
>>> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> every nail hit the tar strip? won't happen with nail guns & roofers knocking
> out 10 square a day.

I hope the nails don't hit the tar strip as that isn't proper technique.

Matt
Dave - 22 Apr 2007 04:39 GMT
>>> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> every nail hit the tar strip? won't happen with nail guns & roofers
> knocking out 10 square a day.

And your assessment of the warranty be worthless is based on what?

Roofers generally ignore the instructions on the shingle package anyway.
They go straight up the roof (no pyramid), then work left and right.  At
least the faster roofing subs do.  Yes, the warranty is void here.  Has
nothing to do with one individual laying shingles on his own roof.
Signature

Dave

Apathy and denial are close cousins

marson - 22 Apr 2007 12:14 GMT
> >>> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Apathy and denial are close cousins

The warranty covers material defects.  That's it.  (Unless you
purchase the "Golden Pledge" coverage from GAF.)  So I guess it's not
worthless--those shingles might be defective, and you might get to
join one of those class actions that you see advertised.  But if you
think that if you follow every instruction on a shingle package and if
your roof leaks, the shingle manufacturer is going to come and make it
right, you're dreaming.
Dave - 24 Apr 2007 01:55 GMT
>> >>> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> your roof leaks, the shingle manufacturer is going to come and make it
> right, you're dreaming.

Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
built.  Every detail followed.  Wasn't that difficult, or time-consuming.

Why a class action suit on a warranty defect?  Mountain out of mole-hill.
Sounds like hearsay and suppostion to me.
Signature

Dave

Apathy and denial are close cousins

marson - 24 Apr 2007 03:14 GMT
On Ap

> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
> built.  Every detail followed.  Wasn't that difficult, or time-consuming.

So you've done one roof and have decided that you know better than
most roofers?  Roofers run shingles straight up because it is faster,
and time is money in construction.

> Why a class action suit on a warranty defect?  Mountain out of mole-hill.
> Sounds like hearsay and suppostion to me.

Believe what you want.  When I hear of just ONE roof repaired by the
manufacturer, I'll consider changing my mind.
Matt Whiting - 24 Apr 2007 12:18 GMT
> On Ap
>> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> most roofers?  Roofers run shingles straight up because it is faster,
> and time is money in construction.

If they run them straight up, then all of the shingle seams will be
exactly aligned and the roof will leak like a sieve.

Matt
marson - 24 Apr 2007 22:39 GMT
> > On Ap
> >> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Matt

course you realize they alternate 6" back and forth.
Matt Whiting - 24 Apr 2007 23:26 GMT
>>> On Ap
>>>> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> course you realize they alternate 6" back and forth.

Well, that isn't "straight", but doing this requires you to slide
shingles between two other shingles for the next "straight up" column
and that certainly can't be fast and risks damaging the shingle.

Matt
Kickstart - 25 Apr 2007 00:05 GMT
"If they run them straight up, then all of the shingle seams will be
>>> exactly aligned and the roof will leak like a sieve.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Matt

Grasshopper ...... there is much to learn

kickstart
marson - 26 Apr 2007 03:21 GMT
> >>> On Ap
> >>>> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Matt

try it, you'll like it.
Matt Whiting - 26 Apr 2007 03:29 GMT
>>>>> On Ap
>>>>>> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> try it, you'll like it.

No, I like doing things right.
marson - 26 Apr 2007 12:24 GMT
> >>>>> On Ap
> >>>>>> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached garage I
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> No, I like doing things right.

And why would your way be better?  Please explain your reasoning.
Don't give me the line about it being on the shingle wrapper, because
Owen Corning's instructions show "vertical racking" as the proper
method, (Perhaps they are a bit more up on the way the vast majority
of roofs are laid down in this country)   In fact, they recommend
against running shingles across and diagonally.
http://www.owenscorning.com/around/roofing/pdfs/Berkshire_Install.pdf
Mike Hammer - 26 Apr 2007 20:36 GMT
>> >>>>> On Ap
>>>>>>>> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>against running shingles across and diagonally.
>http://www.owenscorning.com/around/roofing/pdfs/Berkshire_Install.pdf

Well, I read those directions and it does say to NOT run the shingles across and
diagonally up but there are no reasons given.  Can anyone give me a reason why
those shingles should not be run across?

Mike
Warren Block - 27 Apr 2007 00:42 GMT
>>And why would your way be better?  Please explain your reasoning.
>>Don't give me the line about it being on the shingle wrapper, because
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> diagonally up but there are no reasons given.  Can anyone give me a reason why
> those shingles should not be run across?

GAF says:

"DO NOT lay shingles straight up the roof since this procedure can cause
an incorrect color blend on the roof and may damage the shingles."

http://www.gaf.com/Content/Documents/20222.pdf

Signature

Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA

Mike Hammer - 27 Apr 2007 03:21 GMT
>>>And why would your way be better?  Please explain your reasoning.
>>>Don't give me the line about it being on the shingle wrapper, because
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>http://www.gaf.com/Content/Documents/20222.pdf

That's the way I've always done them.  Does anyone know why Owens Corning
insists on NOT using this method with their Berkshire shingles?

Mike
Matt Whiting - 27 Apr 2007 04:13 GMT
>>>> And why would your way be better?  Please explain your reasoning.
>>>> Don't give me the line about it being on the shingle wrapper, because
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> That's the way I've always done them.  Does anyone know why Owens Corning
> insists on NOT using this method with their Berkshire shingles?

I would guess it has something to do with the pattern of the shingles,
but I've not seen Berkshire shingles up close so that is only a guess.

Matt
Mike Hammer - 27 Apr 2007 04:39 GMT
>>>>> And why would your way be better?  Please explain your reasoning.
>>>>> Don't give me the line about it being on the shingle wrapper, because
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>Matt

So, you think it has something to do with the cosmetic appearance of the
shingles rather than it's intended purpose, which is to keep water from leaking
through them?

Mike
Matt Whiting - 27 Apr 2007 04:46 GMT
>>>>>> And why would your way be better?  Please explain your reasoning.
>>>>>> Don't give me the line about it being on the shingle wrapper, because
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> shingles rather than it's intended purpose, which is to keep water from leaking
> through them?

That is my best guess.  It would be interesting to see the reason from
O-C though.

Matt
Matt Whiting - 27 Apr 2007 04:09 GMT
>>>>>>>> On Ap
>>>>>>>>> Guess I dreamed the composition shingle application on the detached
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> diagonally up but there are no reasons given.  Can anyone give me a reason why
> those shingles should not be run across?

I don't know, but if I was installing these shingles I'd follow the
directions given.  Shingles I've installed in the past recommended
having the edges staggered diagonally up the roof.  I can't for the life
of me see how this is easier when you have to leave out the fastener on
the end and then interleave every other shingle on the next column.  I'd
rather work horizontally and diagonally where I can fully nail every
shingle as I go and just lay them down and not have to pick up the loose
end of another shingle to slip a shingle underneath it.

Matt
marson - 27 Apr 2007 21:43 GMT
> > In article <1177586682.467927.134...@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, marson
> > says...
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Matt

Matt, I'm not sure how else to say this.  In my younger days, I did
some roofs your way.  Run em' accross and diagonally up.  Then one day
I did a roof with someone who showed my how to run em up the roof.  It
was like a revelation.  This was obviously much faster, even if you
have to pick up the corner of every other shingle.  Never went back to
the old way.  Way outweighs the time it takes to scamper back and
forth.  Every single roofer I know runs em straight up the roof.
Matt Whiting - 28 Apr 2007 03:26 GMT
>>> In article <1177586682.467927.134...@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, marson
>>> says...
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> the old way.  Way outweighs the time it takes to scamper back and
> forth.  Every single roofer I know runs em straight up the roof.

I don't doubt that.  The roofers I know and the ones that installed my
roof didn't do that.  I also know a lot of plumbers who will notch 3"
out of the bottom of the center third of a floor joist as well.  That
doesn't make it right.

Matt
Kickstart - 28 Apr 2007 03:44 GMT
Marson ,
your talking to a f.cking idiot, let it go !!!

Kickstart
Matt Whiting - 22 Apr 2007 13:20 GMT
>>>> What is the layout order of starting three tab shingles rows?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> least the faster roofing subs do.  Yes, the warranty is void here.  Has
> nothing to do with one individual laying shingles on his own roof.

I've never seen a roofer do that, but then I tend to hire good roofers,
not fast roofers.  You get what you pay for...

Matt
Kickstart - 22 Apr 2007 16:21 GMT
to do with one individual laying shingles on his own roof.

> I've never seen a roofer do that, but then I tend to hire good roofers,
> not fast roofers.  You get what you pay for...
>
> Matt

Wow !!
Don't get out much huh ?

kickstart
Matt Whiting - 22 Apr 2007 20:41 GMT
> to do with one individual laying shingles on his own roof.
>> I've never seen a roofer do that, but then I tend to hire good roofers,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Wow !!
> Don't get out much huh ?

Apparently not in shabby roofer land.  Let me guess, you live in FL or
TX, right?

Matt
marson - 22 Apr 2007 20:48 GMT
> > to do with one individual laying shingles on his own roof.
> >> I've never seen a roofer do that, but then I tend to hire good roofers,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Matt

Where do you live Matt?  I've never seen a roofer, high end or low
end, do anything but run 'em straight up either, and I live in
northern Minnesota, where construction prices are through the roof, so
to speak.
Matt Whiting - 24 Apr 2007 12:19 GMT
>>> to do with one individual laying shingles on his own roof.
>>>> I've never seen a roofer do that, but then I tend to hire good roofers,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> northern Minnesota, where construction prices are through the roof, so
> to speak.

Northcentral PA.

Matt
Kickstart - 23 Apr 2007 12:44 GMT
>> Wow !!
>> Don't get out much huh ?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Matt

Florida , where roofers have to roof.
Shingles last 10-15 years
And have to keep lots of rain out.
We have roofers from all over come to Florida to show us how "they" do it.
I make a good living fixing their leaks.
Glad your too smart to be here

kickstart- the shabby roofer
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.