Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneralRural LivingHome AutomationSecurity AlarmsConstructionRepairPlumbingCleaningPest ControlLawn and Garden

Homeowner Forum / Construction / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Commercial Building: CMU vs Stucco

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MaxSoi@gmail.com - 26 Jul 2006 02:47 GMT
Anyone have any thoughts on difference in the costs of cmu (concrete
masonary unit) vs stucco?  Any ideas on the costs and benefits of each?
This would be for a commercial retail building in Seattle.  It's our
family's first commerical building development.

I've thought about a wood and stucco combination -- wood on three sides
and a stucco facade.  Or I would do the entire building cmu.

Thanks,

Max.
Bob Morrison - 26 Jul 2006 17:03 GMT
In a previous post MaxSoi@gmail.com wrote...
> Anyone have any thoughts on difference in the costs of cmu (concrete
> masonary unit) vs stucco?  Any ideas on the costs and benefits of each?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I've thought about a wood and stucco combination -- wood on three sides
> and a stucco facade.  Or I would do the entire building cmu.

Max:

Do you have an architect?  If so, seek some recommendations from your
architect.  A common type of finished surface in the Seattle area is EIFS
(a sort of synthetic stucco).  EIFS systems have improved over the past
several years and could be a cost effective alternative provided it is
installed correctly.

The choice of a finished surface depends on the use of your building, fire
code issues, location on the property, the size of the building, etc.

Signature

Bob Morrison, PE, SE
R L Morrison Engineering Co
Structural & Civil Engineering
Poulsbo WA
bob at rlmorrisonengr dot com

tmurf.1@juno.com - 27 Jul 2006 01:00 GMT
> In a previous post MaxSoi@gmail.com wrote...
> > Anyone have any thoughts on difference in the costs of cmu (concrete
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Poulsbo WA
> bob at rlmorrisonengr dot com

CMU is the best bet and it can be stuccoed over.
rj - 29 Jul 2006 20:37 GMT
Please note there is a distinct definition for "stucco." You can find it in
ASTM C926. Many assume "decorative cementitious coating" is synonymous with
stucco and they are not the same. So if you want/specify "stucco" make sure
you GET stucco.

> Anyone have any thoughts on difference in the costs of cmu (concrete
> masonary unit) vs stucco?  Any ideas on the costs and benefits of each?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Max.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.