In a previous post MaxSoi@gmail.com wrote...
> Anyone have any thoughts on difference in the costs of cmu (concrete
> masonary unit) vs stucco? Any ideas on the costs and benefits of each?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I've thought about a wood and stucco combination -- wood on three sides
> and a stucco facade. Or I would do the entire building cmu.
Max:
Do you have an architect? If so, seek some recommendations from your
architect. A common type of finished surface in the Seattle area is EIFS
(a sort of synthetic stucco). EIFS systems have improved over the past
several years and could be a cost effective alternative provided it is
installed correctly.
The choice of a finished surface depends on the use of your building, fire
code issues, location on the property, the size of the building, etc.

Signature
Bob Morrison, PE, SE
R L Morrison Engineering Co
Structural & Civil Engineering
Poulsbo WA
bob at rlmorrisonengr dot com
tmurf.1@juno.com - 27 Jul 2006 01:00 GMT
> In a previous post MaxSoi@gmail.com wrote...
> > Anyone have any thoughts on difference in the costs of cmu (concrete
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Poulsbo WA
> bob at rlmorrisonengr dot com
CMU is the best bet and it can be stuccoed over.
Please note there is a distinct definition for "stucco." You can find it in
ASTM C926. Many assume "decorative cementitious coating" is synonymous with
stucco and they are not the same. So if you want/specify "stucco" make sure
you GET stucco.
> Anyone have any thoughts on difference in the costs of cmu (concrete
> masonary unit) vs stucco? Any ideas on the costs and benefits of each?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Max.