>I have a cheap IR thermometer, A differential can be taken but its only
>a guess. Without knowing if argon is present performance is just not the
>same. I could remove one and send it to a lab, thats my only thought for
>a verified independant test of LowE Argon. I would think there is
>something simpler, since Argon is different than air, something like an
>IR test or photo may show.
I always thought a low E window reflected IR back into the house while
a regular window allowed IR to pass through. So I devised a simple
test.
I took a TV remote control and a digital camera. Pointed the remote at
a window and pressed a button. Then tried to see the reflection of the
remote LED in the window with the display of the digital camera. I
figured that a regular window would show little reflection of the IR
remote while the low E window would show a stronger reflection in the
viewfinder...
End result, I could see no difference between the low E and regular
windows in my house... So either my low E windows arent, or my test
is flawed. I suspect my test is somehow flawed. I recall a similar
test they did on This Old House where they used an actual IR camera
and you could plainly see heat reflections of people in the low E
window and not in the regular window.
dickm
m Ransley - 28 Dec 2005 19:46 GMT
For an IR remote control test at 700mn wavelenght is a filter used in IR
fim photography, Digital are sensitive to this but a block filter is
used by manufacturers, Some are more responsive than others, Sony with
Nightshot is very sensitive at 700 nm , there P&S also but not as much.
Heat starts to register at 2000nm to 5000nm so you need special thermal
imaging set ups. CCD for cameras just dont go that high, but yes Thermal
imaging is best unfortunatly they start at apx 3500$ US