how much concrete needed?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Don D. - 21 Nov 2005 03:36 GMT I am having a work shop built in a couple months and it is going to be 30'X40'. I live in AZ, and would like to know how thick the floor needs to be and the footing? I am thinking about having the stem wall about 6"- 8" high to keep water from the monsoons from running in. I don't know how many yards of Crete I am going to need.
Can anyone help me here? Don D.
JerryD(upstateNY) - 21 Nov 2005 10:53 GMT > I am having a work shop built in a couple months and it is going to be > 30'X40'. I live in AZ, and would like to know how thick the floor needs to > be and the footing? I am thinking about having the stem wall about 6"- 8" > high to keep water from the monsoons from running in.I don't know how many > yards of Crete I am going to need. Can anyone help me here? Don D.< I assume you have a town approved plan. Take the plan to your local concrete redi-mix company and they will tell you how much/what kind of concrete to get. Who is going to do the concrete work ? You could also ask the concrete contractor. If you can't figure how much concrete you need, you will never be able to place/finish the concrete yourself.
 Signature JerryD(upstateNY)
Jim - 21 Nov 2005 13:43 GMT I live in TX, means nothing in relation to identical conditions you mention if I had those. TX and AZ don't suffer monsoons. http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/psr/general/monsoon/
Are you pouring the slab?
There are minimum thickness requirements. Additional may be needed, along with reenforcement, if some great impact or weight conditions exist.
Which general method of form layout are you using for the slab?
Consider a slab higher out of the ground surface, rather than just stem walls. You have at least one door to consider. Landscaping to divert water around the slab should also be considered to protect from underwash afterwards.
 Signature Lil' Dave Beware the rule quoters, the corp mindset, the Borg Else you will be absorbed
> I am having a work shop built in a couple months and it is going to be > 30'X40'. I live in AZ, and would like to know how thick the floor needs to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Can anyone help me here? > Don D. PipeDown - 21 Nov 2005 21:07 GMT 1200 SF 4" thick is 400 cubic feet or a bit under 15yards (14.8). 8" thick would be twice that but you are better off pouring a rat wall (a 4" wall around the perimiter of the slab) as it will take less concrete but a bit more labor building forms. If you are just budgeting now, 20 yards plus delivery may do.
4" thick is usually adequate unless you plan on parking a big rig on it or the underlying soil is loose or soft. Not sure if your city has tougher code enforcement.
A building that size should also have a footing as the structure over 1200 SF would be heavy. What kind of footing and how deep depends on soil conditions and the type of structure on top.
The best construction would be a perimiter foundation wall with footer and a slab poured inside its confines.
>I am having a work shop built in a couple months and it is going to be >30'X40'. I live in AZ, and would like to know how thick the floor needs to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Can anyone help me here? > Don D. James Nipper - 21 Nov 2005 22:00 GMT " The best construction would be a perimiter foundation wall with footer and a slab poured inside its confines."
------------------------------
I have a question about the above comment. (and , it seems correct to me by the way). But, I have seen some builders pour a perimeter footing, lay the perimenter cinder block, and then pour the inside slab afterwards.
Can someone tell me the pros and cons of the above approach?? If you are using block walls, is it best to pour the footings and slab all at the same time, and then build the block walls ??
Thanks for the advice !!
--James--
PipeDown - 21 Nov 2005 22:49 GMT Since the footer is usually below grade (how much depends on the frost line) and the slab is at grade I don't see an advantage to pouring both at once unless it is economic. The perimiter wall serves as the form for the slab making for less labor and materials even if it has to be done on different days (unless the concrete delivery charge is very high due to a remote location)
As for block or poured wall, so long as the load is downward the choice can be made entirely on budget (materials and labor, which method is lower). Again, the concrete delivery charge might be the tipping point for you. I could DIY a block wall but not a poured one. If you pour the slab before building a block wall, you save a trip on concrete delivery but you will not get as good a bond between the wall and slab. This could allow water intrusion if the water table rises. And if the form for the slab shifts or is not square, the walls will be harder to build
If I were to DIY this I would look for precast footer blocks (if they exist, I am not sure) and build a block wall then order the concrete slab. If your in Phoenix or Tuscon you don't need to worry about freezing but in Flagstaff you need a better footer.
> " > The best construction would be a perimiter foundation wall with footer and [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > --James-- Don D. - 22 Nov 2005 00:41 GMT PipeDown Thanks for all the info. I was thinking about pouring for the footing and a 4 -8 wall (Block or concrete) for water runoff, then have the building built on top of that. When more money comes around the corner then pour the floor. I was talking to a friend who just put up his shed and laid a 3/4 tongue and grove ply floor with 2X6 runners. He thought it was cheaper by the foot for his use. I have not checked that route. I will not be driving on it, but I think the crete would be easier to clean up with.
I am debating on steel or (***wood***) depending on cost. It will be a wood working shop to work in and a small part for welding and metal working (**with the walls covered with something for sparks if doing it in wood**)
I have a couple months before I do buy and lay it out, So I am putting out my feelers here to get all the help I can.
Anyone else have anything to add will help.
Don D.
> Since the footer is usually below grade (how much depends on the frost > line) and the slab is at grade I don't see an advantage to pouring both at [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >> >> --James-- rider89 - 22 Nov 2005 02:28 GMT i think i'd stick with a slab floor. try for a floor drain, if possible. your footing and block wall plan sounds good (and economical). since you have some time, you might run across some salvage on white steel siding from light commercial construction. seems like there's always something being taken down in a given area, and it usually will be discarded. i think it makes a good fire resistent interior wall covering for a shop, and if you can get it in white, it helps with the lighting. same on ceiling.
bill
> PipeDown > Thanks for all the info. I was thinking about pouring for the footing and [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] >>> >>> --James-- HerHusband - 22 Nov 2005 17:59 GMT James,
> The best construction would be a perimeter foundation wall with footer > and a slab poured inside its confines. That's the approach I used.
I used 2x6's and 2x8's to form the footings, installed #4 rebar, and poured the concrete.
A week later, I built forms out of 3/4" plywood and a 2x4 framework. Each plywood sheet produced two 2x8 foot forms. Anchored them to the footing, tied them together top and bottom, install #4 rebar and anchor bolts, oiled the forms inside, and poured the concrete.
Another week later, I stripped the wall forms, then brought in gravel and compacted it down over a layer of 6 mil plastic. I hired out the actual pouring of the slab. That needed more manpower and experience than I could do on my own.
It's more complicated and expensive than a simple slab, but it has many advantages. The exterior wood is elevated 1 to 1-1/2 feet above the ground to minimize splashback damage and rot. And you gain an extra 1-1/2 feet of headroom inside. The monolithic pour is stronger than block, more resistant to seismic movement, and less likely to leak (no joints).
The footing forms can be cleaned up and reused. Many of ours became studs or blocking in the rest of the building.
You can rent the wall forms, but we were reusing ours a few times for our house foundation. So we preferred to build our own forms. We later used them to build scaffolding, and finally sold them to a farmer who was going to build small buildings from them.
Anthony
Wayne Whitney - 22 Nov 2005 19:23 GMT > I used 2x6's and 2x8's to form the footings, installed #4 rebar, and > poured the concrete. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > tied them together top and bottom, install #4 rebar and anchor bolts, > oiled the forms inside, and poured the concrete. Basic question: what is the reason to pour the footings and stem walls separately? Easier to do the forms that way?
Thanks, Wayne
JerryD(upstateNY) - 23 Nov 2005 11:36 GMT >Basic question: what is the reason to pour the footings and stem walls separately ? Easier to do the forms that way ? Thanks, Wayne<
If you pour the footings and then pour the walls, you have something to set the wall forms on and you can fasten the bottom of the wall forms to the footing to keep them straight. If you do it all in one pour, First, you have to hold up the wall forms so they don't fall into the footer forms. Then you have to put braces on the top AND bottom of the wall forms every 4 to 6 feet to keep it lined up. It takes 3-4 times as much time to do it all at once. Then when you pour it, every time you put a vibrator in the wall form, the concrete runs out of the wall form and goes into in the footer form and you have to shovel it back into the wall form. It is a complete disaster trying to pour it all at once.
 Signature JerryD(upstateNY)
HerHusband - 23 Nov 2005 16:19 GMT > Basic question: what is the reason to pour the footings and stem walls > separately? Easier to do the forms that way? Jerry described the reasons rather well. I know some people do it, but it seems like a lot more work that way, with a greater chance of things going wrong.
A few other reasons I personally did them seperately:
1. It's easier to "get out of the dirt" by pouring the footings first. A nice level footing gives you a starting place for the concrete walls and the rest of the building. Much easier to level up the 2x6's than a 2'x8' wall form.
2. By pouring the footings and the walls separately, I only needed one truck load of concrete. If I had poured them as a unit, I would have had to coordinate a couple of trucks. Would have been tricky on our tight building site.
3. I also think it's easier to position the rebar and whatnot than it would be if everything was formed up at once.
4. Nobody ever see's it once you backfill, but it's easier to screed and float the footings if you pour them separately. Otherwise, you'd have concrete bulging up above the footing on the outside of the wall forms.
Anthony
Don D. - 29 Nov 2005 14:58 GMT I live in Southern AZ. and the ground is hard packed with a lot of colechy( most likely not spelled right) and when it rains it is like clay, I was wondering how deep and thick should I do the footing on a 30 X 40 workshop? I was thinking 12" wide on the footing for 8" blocks a few rows up or have it poured for the stem wall and put the building on top of that.
I see HF has a 3 1/2 yard mixer on sale every now and then. Would that be a way to go with the cost of create going up ever month moreless? I am 15 miles out in the middle of know were. Or would that take to long to mix up for the footing or even cost to much buying everything?
Just pre asking before I spend money stupidly.
Don D.
>I am having a work shop built in a couple months and it is going to be >30'X40'. I live in AZ, and would like to know how thick the floor needs to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Can anyone help me here? > Don D.
|
|
|