In a previous post RicodJour wrote...
> Roughly half of the entire rough load. There are snow, wind, and dead
> loads based on your area, modifications dependent on roof slope and
> height above ground, etc.
Rico:
A small quibble. The OP asked for the reaction. The beam carries
approximately half the roof load as you correctly noted. However, the
ridge beam reaction would be approximately 1/4 of the total roof load.
To the OP: You will need to know the snow load for your area. If you are
in a mountainous area, do not rely on the snow load maps in the UBC, SBC,
or IBC codes. They are notoriously inaccurate for mountainous areas.
Check with your local building official for more guidance.

Signature
Bob Morrison, PE, SE
R L Morrison Engineering Co
Structural & Civil Engineering
Poulsbo WA
RicodJour - 31 Aug 2005 16:47 GMT
> In a previous post RicodJour wrote...
> > Roughly half of the entire rough load. There are snow, wind, and dead
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> or IBC codes. They are notoriously inaccurate for mountainous areas.
> Check with your local building official for more guidance.
Bob, a small quibble about your quibble. The body of the OP's post:
"Is there a formula to calculate the load (pound/ft) carried by the
roof
ridge beam that is supporting tributary rafters without collar ties
(the
rafters are supported on the walls)."
The message is asking for load information not reaction information. I
usually reply to the actual message, not the subject line. People
often sexy the subject line up to grab attention.
I also think you may be a little too literal in your interpretation of
what the OP meant by reaction. I believe he meant reactions - another
way of asking for total load. YMMV
R
Bob Morrison - 31 Aug 2005 17:45 GMT
In a previous post RicodJour wrote...
> I also think you may be a little too literal in your interpretation of
> what the OP meant by reaction. I believe he meant reactions - another
> way of asking for total load
Rico:
Right you are! My apologies.
I guess my coffee hadn't kicked in when I replied. I was in a little too
much of a hurry and didn't read clear through the original post.

Signature
Bob Morrison, PE, SE
R L Morrison Engineering Co
Structural & Civil Engineering
Poulsbo WA
RicodJour - 31 Aug 2005 17:50 GMT
> In a previous post RicodJour wrote...
> > I also think you may be a little too literal in your interpretation of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I guess my coffee hadn't kicked in when I replied. I was in a little too
> much of a hurry and didn't read clear through the original post.
Well, there's the problem. I have an IV stand with a caffeine drip
next to the bed. I like bolting out of the starting gate. ;)
R