If it is the lumber companys fault they should pay not you. You also
are loosing on labor for the instal removal. Liens expire. I would not
pay the lumber co but consider taking them to small claims court if
they press you or threaten you with a lien. In small claims you do not
use an atty or need one. Let them know court will cost them more, atty
time and the labor for install and removal you paid for. If it was
truely their mistake why are you worring and paying out of your pocket,
let them restock and sell them, they will probably not loose on the
deal, they will just sell them at near cost in a month or so, go in and
talk to the owner not a employee, you will probably come out very happy.
The owner does not want to loose customers or his good name.
Lemme see if I have this correct, you say the measuerments were correct..and
I assume it was the contractor that measured them..?
If that's the case, then it is ganahl's fault, and they should replace them.
We went through a simular situation with Anderson windows, except it waas
their fault for shipping the wrong style of windows, it took the homeowner a
year, and a band of lawyers to it corrected.
What you may want to do, is place another order for the correct windows, I
know, that means paying twice for the same products, but at least you'd have
the proper windows, then proceed with legally getting your $$ back, call a
lawyer..and have them take action.
> You are right, it isn't my problem BUT
> Ganahl Lumber is actually at fault and only will replace the 4 windows that
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> > Hung like Einstein and smart as a horse
> > Remove NO SPAM from e-mai address to reply
m Ransley - 29 Jan 2005 20:56 GMT
Why pay a lawyer all the money it is a simple case for small claim, easy
to win if you have the reciepts and measurements on the reciepts or can
prove what you say. It wont go to court if he presents his case properly
to the owner of the company. Or go small claim
GLT - 29 Jan 2005 22:13 GMT
O.K....in our case there were 12 windows that were wrong, and the owner had
access to a band of lawyers...so it was worth it to him.
But your correct, a small claims court filing should do the trick, as if you
say, all the Proof, i.e. paper work is there..
Signed..I stand corrected...
> Why pay a lawyer all the money it is a simple case for small claim, easy
> to win if you have the reciepts and measurements on the reciepts or can
> prove what you say. It wont go to court if he presents his case properly
> to the owner of the company. Or go small claim
m Ransley - 29 Jan 2005 21:06 GMT
Negotiate monday if you fail file in court monday, easy usualy 35$ and
ten minutes. Send the boss a letter on monday saying you will drop the
case if he complies now, but you better have you facts and proof right.
Dont pay twice for what you say is not your fault. I have done this.
Dave - 30 Jan 2005 01:19 GMT
The facts are simple as they will take back the 4 wrong windows BUT to take
back the other 4 because
I will have to change the style to meet egress might be another issue. I
feel since they orginally got the
non complaint egress windows and we based the rest of the order on those
windows so they'd all match
they should replace the remaing 4 windows to match what I have to get now to
meet egress. Doesn't this
seem only right? As of now I'm refusing to pay for any window that can not
be installed at my house.
> Negotiate monday if you fail file in court monday, easy usualy 35$ and
> ten minutes. Send the boss a letter on monday saying you will drop the
> case if he complies now, but you better have you facts and proof right.
> Dont pay twice for what you say is not your fault. I have done this.