Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsGeneralRural LivingHome AutomationSecurity AlarmsConstructionRepairPlumbingCleaningPest ControlLawn and Garden

Homeowner Forum / Construction / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Milgard windows that not the right size

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dave - 28 Jan 2005 02:32 GMT
Is there a market out there for brand new milgard windows that got ordered
but were not the right size.
They are Vinyl dual pane Lo E - no grids- double hung-nail on new
construction windows.
My contracted goofed with my egress windows and now we need to reorder new
windows that
will work for us and sell the double hung wrong size windows. This is the
list of the window sizes:
QTY        Size            total cost new
4        4'  0' x 5' 0"      $1400- one got installed but will be removed
3        4' 0" x 4' 6"      $975
1        4' 0" x 3' 0"       $281

The windows are at my house in Southern California
GLT - 28 Jan 2005 05:25 GMT
I've bought new/wrong windows before, but ONLY if they were new, or near
new, and in proper working order. Try listing them on the recycler, it's to
bad the 4o 3o isn't a 3o 4o I'd buy it from ya..

> Is there a market out there for brand new milgard windows that got ordered
> but were not the right size.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> The windows are at my house in Southern California
tbasc@bellsouth.net - 28 Jan 2005 12:00 GMT
Consider Habitat for Humanity.
A donation of material counts as a charitable donation.
Locally, Habitat has a resale store.

TB
JR-jred - 28 Jan 2005 13:39 GMT
> Is there a market out there for brand new milgard windows that got ordered
> but were not the right size.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> The windows are at my house in Southern California

I don't know what your relatonship with your contractor is or if you're
just trying to do him a favor, but how is this YOUR problem?

He is the one who screwed it up. It should be his problem.  And I hope
you're not paying for the mismeasured windows.

Signature

-JR
Hung like Einstein and smart as a horse
Remove NO SPAM from e-mai address to reply

Dave - 29 Jan 2005 03:18 GMT
You are right, it isn't my problem BUT
Ganahl Lumber is actually at fault and only will replace the 4 windows that
didn't meet egress code.
The other 4 were selected to match the style of the double hung egress
windows but now
I don't want to have a mix of double hung and sliders on the house as all
these windows
are on the street side and a mix would look shitty. The windows were never
mismeasured.
The information from Ganahl Lumber on proper egress size was wrong. We feel
that we
should have had them take back all the windows and order the correct, code
compliant and matching windows.
I am wrong to think that that is only fair? My only option now is not to pay
for the windows and go
else where for the other 4 windows since Ganahl won't take them back and
order the matching ones.
Since I don't plan on moving any time soon they can put a lean on the house
which I would rather not
happen. My wife says it's the contractor's problem and he'll get no money
for us for the windows we can't use!

Is there a market out there for brand new milgard windows that got ordered
but were not the right size.
They are Vinyl dual pane Lo E - no grids- double hung-nail on new
construction windows.
My contracted goofed with my egress windows and now we need to reorder new
windows that will work for us and sell the double hung wrong size windows.
This is the
list of the window sizes:
QTY        Size            total cost new
4        4'  0' x 5' 0"      $1400- one got installed but will be removed
3        4' 0" x 4' 6"      $975
1        4' 0" x 3' 0"       $281

The windows are at my house in Southern California

I don't know what your relatonship with your contractor is or if you're
just trying to do him a favor, but how is this YOUR problem?

He is the one who screwed it up. It should be his problem.
And I hope you're not paying for the mismeasured windows.
m Ransley - 29 Jan 2005 14:28 GMT
If it is the lumber companys fault they should pay not you.  You also
are loosing on labor for the instal removal. Liens expire. I would not
pay the lumber co but consider taking them to small claims  court if
they press you or threaten you with a lien.  In small claims you do not
use an atty or need one.  Let them know court will cost them more, atty
time and the labor for install and removal you paid for. If it was
truely their mistake why are you worring and paying out of your pocket,
let them restock and sell them, they will probably not loose on the
deal, they will just sell them at near cost in a month or so, go in and
talk to the owner not a employee, you will probably come out very happy.
The owner does not want to loose customers or his good name.
GLT - 29 Jan 2005 18:47 GMT
Lemme see if I have this correct, you say the measuerments were correct..and
I assume it was the contractor that measured them..?
If that's the case, then it is ganahl's fault, and they should replace them.
We went through a simular situation with Anderson windows, except it waas
their fault for shipping the wrong style of windows, it took the homeowner a
year, and a band of lawyers to it corrected.

What you may want to do, is place another order for the correct windows, I
know, that means paying twice for the same products, but at least you'd have
the proper windows, then proceed with legally getting your $$ back, call a
lawyer..and have them take action.

> You are right, it isn't my problem BUT
> Ganahl Lumber is actually at fault and only will replace the 4 windows that
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> > Hung like Einstein and smart as a horse
> > Remove NO SPAM from e-mai address to reply
m Ransley - 29 Jan 2005 20:56 GMT
Why pay a lawyer all the money it is a simple case for small claim, easy
to win if you have the reciepts and measurements on the reciepts or can
prove what you say. It wont go to court if he presents his case properly
to the owner of the company. Or go small claim
GLT - 29 Jan 2005 22:13 GMT
O.K....in our case there were 12 windows that were wrong, and the owner had
access to a band of lawyers...so it was worth it to him.

But your correct, a small claims court filing should do the trick, as if you
say, all the Proof, i.e. paper work is there..

Signed..I stand corrected...

> Why pay a lawyer all the money it is a simple case for small claim, easy
> to win if you have the reciepts and measurements on the reciepts or can
> prove what you say. It wont go to court if he presents his case properly
> to the owner of the company. Or go small claim
m Ransley - 29 Jan 2005 21:06 GMT
Negotiate monday if you fail file in court monday, easy usualy 35$ and
ten minutes.  Send the boss a letter on monday saying you will drop the
case if he complies now, but you better have you facts and proof right.
Dont pay twice for what you say is not your fault. I have done this.
Dave - 30 Jan 2005 01:19 GMT
The facts are simple as they will take back the 4 wrong windows BUT to take
back the other 4  because
I will have to change the style to meet egress might be another issue. I
feel since they orginally got the
non complaint egress windows and we based the rest of the order on those
windows so they'd all match
they should replace the remaing 4 windows to match what I have to get now to
meet egress. Doesn't this
seem only right? As of now I'm refusing to pay for any window that can not
be installed at my house.

> Negotiate monday if you fail file in court monday, easy usualy 35$ and
> ten minutes.  Send the boss a letter on monday saying you will drop the
> case if he complies now, but you better have you facts and proof right.
> Dont pay twice for what you say is not your fault. I have done this.
Getty - 30 Jan 2005 04:05 GMT
> Is there a market out there for brand new milgard windows that got ordered
> but were not the right size.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> The windows are at my house in Southern California

Exactly what is it which doesn't meet egress?  From the sizes you posted it
looks as if only the one window which is 4'0"x3'0" might be the only one
that may be close, depending on the meeting rail width for 5.7 sq ft free
opening.  If the 4'x3' is going in at ground floor, it may pass the 5.0 sq.
ft.  Or am I missing the obvious here?
Dave - 30 Jan 2005 05:50 GMT
Actually it's the 4' 0" x 5" )' that are not complaint.
the clear space when the double hung widow is opened is only 23" tall and
the code is mininum 24" with that size opening then the witdth must be about
3' to equal the 5.7 sqft of required opening
On a slider the mininum width is 20" and then the height must be tall enough
to = 5.7sqft or about 3.2 "

>> Is there a market out there for brand new milgard windows that got
>> ordered
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> sq.
> ft.  Or am I missing the obvious here?
Dave - 30 Jan 2005 16:25 GMT
Actually it's the 4' 0" x 5' 0" windows that are not complaint.
the clear space when the double hung widow is opened is only 23" tall and
the code is mininum 24" of clea space With that size opening then the width
must be about
3' to equal the 5.7 sqft of required opening
On a slider the mininum width is 20" and then the height must be tall enough
to = 5.7sqft or about 3.2 "

>>> Is there a market out there for brand new milgard windows that got
>>> ordered
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>> sq.
>> ft.  Or am I missing the obvious here?
Getty - 30 Jan 2005 17:17 GMT
> Actually it's the 4' 0" x 5" )' that are not complaint.
> the clear space when the double hung widow is opened is only 23" tall and
> the code is mininum 24" with that size opening then the witdth must be about
> 3' to equal the 5.7 sqft of required opening
> On a slider the mininum width is 20" and then the height must be tall enough
> to = 5.7sqft or about 3.2 "

Ok, so out of a 5'0" height, only 23" opening.  Sure is a waste the way they
open.  That is, if you listed the width first (which is the way windows are
specified when stating size) then the height.  Unless you stated height
first, which would make sense with the 23" opening.
Dave - 30 Jan 2005 18:40 GMT
no I have been listing the width first then height. Yes it seems strange for
a 5' 0" window not to open at least 24" but with the balance system and
stops all you get is 23".

>> Actually it's the 4' 0" x 5" )' that are not complaint.
>> the clear space when the double hung widow is opened is only 23" tall and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> specified when stating size) then the height.  Unless you stated height
> first, which would make sense with the 23" opening.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.